How
Genuine is the Catharsis of "A Raisin in the Sun"?

"A Raisin in the Sun" ends with the Younger family
deciding to finally get out of their "rat trap" in the Chicago
ghettos and move to their new house in Clybourne Park. The play ends with a suspenseful
confrontation with Lindner in which Walter has a change of heart and realizes
that their family has to move out and face their new white neighbors whether
they are welcome or not. This ending leaves the audience with a feeling of hope
and triumph, and definitely catharsis. However, as we read in the packet about
Lorraine Hansberry and her play, the original closing scene was of the Younger
family as they sat, armed and in the dark of their new living room in Clybourne
Park, waiting for the white mob to come get them. This ending gives a very different
feeling than the revised version, and it leaves the audience in suspense. I
would say it lacks catharsis and the feeling of triumph that accompanies the
current ending of the play. If Hansberry had left this original scene in the
play, the message would be different and it would not seem that racism was
dying, but that it was winning. All it takes is one extra scene at the end to
completely change the meaning of the play. You can take any play, book, movie,
or story of any kind and add something extra to the end--perhaps the next
untold part of the story--and it would change the meaning. Stories end at
strategic points to leave the right feeling with the audience and to portray
the right message. Take Harry Potter for example. The last book ends with Harry
defeating Voldemort and then fast-forwards 20 years and shows Harry happily
married to Ginny and living life happily ever after. But what if you added one
last scene about a new evil wizard beginning to plot his plan to take over the
wizarding world? The ending wouldn't leave the audience with a sigh of relief,
but with a gasp! People would wonder what it was supposed to mean: was the
message to say that evil can never truly be eliminated? Obviously that is the
complete opposite of what the Harry Potter saga was supposed to teach, but
something like that could happen after the events of the story, just like the
Youngers could get killed by an angry mob. You can always wonder what happens
next after a story ends, but sometimes it's best not to. Once you start
imagining the unwritten events after an ending, anything can happen and it can
lead you away from the purpose of the story.
Riley, you make some very interesting comments on structure and author's intent. I liked how you tied in the literary criticism--that point made me think about what if, too. I just finished "The Fault in Our Stars" which raises some interesting questions along the same lines. It is interesting to track how different authors and readers question the endings of works. I like how you used the example of Harry Potter to illustrate your point.
ReplyDelete